United Kingdom • • • 🌿 Progressive

£600m UK theme park developer tied to sanctioned oligarch, report reveals

£600m UK theme park developer tied to sanctioned oligarch, report reveals

French developer Puy du Fou, behind a £600 million UK theme park, worked with a sanctioned oligarch on Crimea plans longer than disclosed and later sought…

Workers and local communities set to host a £600 million theme park in the United Kingdom now face uncomfortable questions about the background of the project's promoter, after an exclusive Guardian investigation revealed that French company Puy du Fou worked with a sanctioned oligarch on Crimea resort plans for longer than it had acknowledged — and later courted Iran and China for commercial deals. 🔹 What happened: Russian soldiers in unmarked uniforms took control of Crimea in February 2014, beginning the annexation overseen by Vladimir Putin. According to The Guardian, Puy du Fou maintained ties with a sanctioned oligarch involved in development plans for the peninsula during that period. The company later pursued agreements with Iran and China before advancing its £600 million project in the UK. No public statement from UK authorities was reported in the source. 🔹 Why it matters: People living near the proposed site, and workers who might have expected stable employment from the project, have a direct interest in knowing whether the investors behind it passed rigorous screening. When a developer carries documented ties to a sanctioned oligarch and commercial history with countries under international scrutiny, the communities hosting that investment absorb the legal and reputational risk if complications arise. The absence of any official government response compounds the concern. 📌 EPM Take: The communities that were told this project would bring economic opportunity deserve more than silence from regulators. Puy du Fou's trajectory — from Crimea-linked dealings in 2014 to Iran and China outreach, and then to a £600 million UK project — is a sequence that should have appeared in a due diligence report. The question for residents and workers is direct: did anyone in the approval chain read that history, and if they did, what decision did they make and why?
📤 Share on Telegram

¿Te gustó este artículo? Recibe cobertura global en tu correo.

Suscríbete gratis / Subscribe free