United States • August 02, 2026 • EPM Editorial Desk • 🌿 Progressive

Nearly two-thirds of Americans oppose Iran war as Trump pauses strikes

An AP poll found almost two-thirds of Americans say the Iran war is not worth fighting, as Trump announced a cancellation of planned strikes pending a deal…

An AP poll published this week found that almost two-thirds of Americans say the war against Iran is not worth the fight — and it is against that backdrop that President Donald Trump announced Saturday night he had cancelled planned strikes on Iran, conditional on a deal that no party has independently confirmed, according to The Associated Press. 🔹 What happened: Trump posted on Truth Social that Iran and other Middle Eastern nations asked the U.S. to hold off military action, and that "the perimeters of a deal has been agreed to." The proposed terms, as described by Trump, include the immediate and complete opening of the Hormuz Strait and an end to Iran's nuclear threat. Trump said Israel is part of the commitment. Prior reports indicated the U.S. and Israel were set to hit Iran's energy infrastructure over the weekend. Iran's semi-official Mehr agency, citing unnamed military officials, called Trump's claims "simply a new lie." Iran has not officially responded. 🔹 Why it matters: For American families who have watched this conflict unfold since February, the AP poll result carries direct weight: the majority do not support continuing the war. The cancellation, however, does not mean a ceasefire or a signed agreement. Trump's stated conditions — full Hormuz opening and dismantling of Iran's nuclear threat — are sweeping demands Tehran has not acknowledged publicly. Mehr's explicit rejection raises further doubt about whether any agreement exists. Citizens in the region and in the U.S. remain in uncertainty, with no independent verification of what, if anything, was agreed upon between the parties. 📌 EPM Take: The sharpest fact in this story is not the cancelled strike — it is that nearly two-thirds of Americans, per AP's poll this week, have already decided this war is not worth its cost. That number lands on the same night Trump announces a pause that Tehran's own media calls a lie. For the people living with the consequences of a conflict that began in February, the gap between a presidential Truth Social post and a verified, signed agreement is not a technicality — it is the difference between war and peace. EPM has tracked how Gaza deal announcements left key parties unconfirmed for weeks. The same architecture is visible here. The scenario no one is naming: if Mehr's denial reflects Tehran's actual position, this pause may be measured in hours, not weeks.

President Donald Trump signaled Saturday that sustained military pressure can produce diplomatic movement: he announced on Truth Social that he cancelled planned strikes against Iran's energy infrastructure after Tehran and regional partners requested a pause, with deal parameters already agreed upon, according to The Associated Press. Trump made clear the U.S. remains ready to act if negotiations fail. 🔹 What happened: Trump wrote that the U.S. was "locked and loaded and ready to go" against Iran but agreed to cancel the strike based on Iran's request, contingent on reaching a deal "rapidly." The terms Trump outlined include the "Immediate, Complete, and Total OPENING OF THE HORMUZ STRAIT" and an end to Iran's nuclear threat. He confirmed Israel is part of the commitment. Prior reporting had indicated both the U.S. and Israel were preparing strikes on Iranian energy infrastructure over the weekend. Iran's semi-official Mehr agency, citing unnamed military officials, rejected Trump's account as "simply a new lie." Iran claims its nuclear program is peaceful. 🔹 Why it matters: A guaranteed opening of the Hormuz Strait would be a concrete strategic and economic win for Western energy security. Trump's approach — keeping real military capability on the table while negotiating — differs from diplomatic cycles where pressure was absent. Israel's inclusion in the commitment signals regional coordination rather than a unilateral U.S. decision. If the deal materializes, it would be the most significant development of the war that began in February. Mehr's denial, however, indicates internal resistance in Tehran, making the next hours a critical window for determining whether this pause leads to a real agreement. 📌 EPM Take: What conventional analysis is missing tonight is this: Iran did not ignore Trump's threat — Iran asked for time. That is not a diplomatic victory for Tehran; it is a signal that the military posture was credible enough to produce a response. Since the war began in February, the strategy of sustained pressure has defined Washington's approach, and this pause is consistent with that logic. EPM previously covered how Gaza deal announcements required weeks to establish which parties had genuinely committed. The same test applies here. Trump's conditions — full Hormuz access and resolution of Iran's nuclear threat — are not symbolic gestures; they are structural demands. If Tehran confirms nothing publicly in the hours ahead, the question is not whether an attack resumes, but on what timeline. Trump already answered that part.

Dos tercios de americanos rechazan guerra mientras Trump pausa ataque iraní

Una encuesta de AP reveló que casi dos tercios de los estadounidenses creen que la guerra contra Irán no vale la pena, mientras Trump anunció la cancelación de…

Casi dos tercios de los estadounidenses consideran que la guerra contra Irán no vale la pena, según una encuesta de AP publicada esta semana, y es ese contexto el que enmarca el anuncio del presidente Donald Trump el sábado por la noche: canceló los ataques planeados contra Irán, condicionados a un acuerdo que aún no ha sido confirmado por ninguna de las partes involucradas. 🔹 Lo que pasó: En una publicación en Truth Social, Trump afirmó que Irán y otros países de Medio Oriente solicitaron a Estados Unidos aplazar el ataque, y que "los parámetros de un acuerdo han sido acordados". El mandatario detalló que el pacto incluiría la apertura total del Estrecho de Ormuz y el fin de la amenaza nuclear iraní. Reportes previos señalaban que Washington e Israel se preparaban para atacar la infraestructura energética iraní durante el fin de semana. Israel, según Trump, forma parte del compromiso. La agencia semioficial Mehr, citando fuentes militares iraníes sin nombre, calificó las afirmaciones de Trump como "simplemente una nueva mentira". 🔹 Por qué importa: Para los ciudadanos estadounidenses que cargan con el costo humano y económico de un conflicto iniciado en febrero, la encuesta de AP es una señal directa: la mayoría no respalda la continuación de la guerra. Sin embargo, la cancelación del ataque no significa paz ni acuerdo firmado. Las condiciones anunciadas por Trump —apertura del Estrecho de Ormuz, fin del programa nuclear iraní— son demandas de largo alcance que Irán no ha aceptado públicamente. Mientras tanto, las familias en ambos lados del conflicto permanecen en incertidumbre. La ausencia de confirmación independiente del acuerdo, combinada con el rechazo explícito de Mehr, pone en duda si existe un camino real hacia la desescalada. 📌 Conclusión EPM: El dato más incómodo de esta historia no es la cancelación del ataque: es que casi dos tercios de los americanos —la mayoría de los cuales no diseñan política exterior— ya decidieron que este conflicto no justifica su costo. Esa cifra, publicada por AP esta semana, llega en el momento en que Trump anuncia una pausa que Teherán rechaza como mentira. EPM ha documentado este patrón antes: en Gaza, un anuncio de acuerdo precedió semanas de ambigüedad sobre quién realmente había firmado qué. Si el Estrecho de Ormuz y el programa nuclear son las condiciones base, y Teherán las niega públicamente, el escenario que nadie nombra es que esta "cancelación" sea simplemente el intervalo entre dos rondas de escalada.

📤 Share on Telegram

¿Te gustó este artículo? Recibe cobertura global en tu correo.

Suscríbete gratis / Subscribe free